경찰 ‘수면제 대리처방 의혹’ MC몽 수사 착수
I wanted to test this claim with SAT problems. Why SAT? Because solving SAT problems require applying very few rules consistently. The principle stays the same even if you have millions of variables or just a couple. So if you know how to reason properly any SAT instances is solvable given enough time. Also, it's easy to generate completely random SAT problems that make it less likely for LLM to solve the problem based on pure pattern recognition. Therefore, I think it is a good problem type to test whether LLMs can generalize basic rules beyond their training data.
，详情可参考51吃瓜
「但我們覺得令人擔憂的是，大眾一再聽到英國正在經歷復興，而我認為這具有誤導性。」
San Francisco, CA
人 民 网 版 权 所 有 ，未 经 书 面 授 权 禁 止 使 用