The existence of such a fiction, moreover, tells against another tempting account of the distinctive moral wrong of battery, on which the wrong consists in deliberately harming or offending (or deliberately touching in a foreseeably harmful or conventionally offensive way) another person.190 Suppose that the defendant is a hit man seeking to murder A with a sniper rifle. A is in his line of sight, but then B, whom the defendant has no desire to kill, moves in front of A. As the defendant knows, therefore, if he pulls the trigger of his rifle, the bullet will unavoidably kill B on its path to killing A. When he pulls the trigger and kills both A and B, the defendant seriously wrongs both of them. And it does not seem that the defendant’s wrong to A is significantly graver than, or in some important respect morally distinct from, his wrong to B: These victims are more or less equally mistreated. Certainly these culpable and wrongful injurings do not seem morally distinct in any way that bears upon the defendant’s remedial moral liabilities: The defendant is liable to B’s estate no less than A’s estate, and it would not be morally permissible or proper for the defendant, if rendered insolvent, to give any significant priority to satisfying one liability over the other.
Another reason ignoring the literature can be helpful is that。关于这个话题，新收录的资料提供了深入分析
。业内人士推荐新收录的资料作为进阶阅读
Заявления Трампа об ударе по иранской школе опровергли14:48
据报道，此前在 2026 年 2 月 13 日，最高法首次发布道路交通安全刑事专题指导性案例，其中明确激活辅助驾驶功能情形下驾驶人的刑事责任认定规则。。关于这个话题，新收录的资料提供了深入分析